Parting Gifts for Carbon Capture, From the 116th Congress

Carbon capture enjoyed a winter flurry of federal policy victories in the waning days of 2020 and at the start of 2021. In just a little more than a week, carbon capture hit a policy trifecta: new, aggressive R&D authorizations, a carbon capture tax credit (“45Q”) extension, and final Administrative rules on how project developers can properly claim the 45Q credit.

New, aggressive carbon capture R&D authorizations
The Energy Act of 2020, stewarded by Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) in the Senate and Reps. Greg Walden (R-OR), Frank Lucas (R-OK), Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX) and Frank Pallone (D-NJ) in the House crossed the proverbial finish line as part of the year-end stimulus package. It was the first comprehensive update of American energy policy since 2005, revamping research programs across the technology spectrum. In a sign of its diverse support, arguably no clean energy technology fared better than carbon capture. To name just a few new programs: Congress directed the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to build at least six power and industrial carbon capture projects, develop carbon removal prize programs and formalize a new research thrust that ‘recycles’ carbon dioxide into valuable products. If fully funded, DOE would nearly triple its carbon capture investments from recent levels.

A federal tax credit extension
The federal 45Q tax credit, one of the main motivations for new carbon capture projects, was extended for two more years. Developers now have until December 31, 2025 to commence construction on projects to be eligible for the credit. More than two dozen projects have been publicly announced and are at various stages of development since Congress made sweeping changes to the credit in 2018. This extension was critical because time was running short to provide financial certainty to project developers, and carbon capture projects take several years to plan, often involving multiple stakeholders and hundreds of millions of dollars in investment. In 2018, Congress made major legislative changes to the credit, but for two years, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) did not finalize Administrative rules to claim the revamped credit.

A new credit, with new rules from the IRS
Coincidentally, the IRS published its final 45Q regulations just ten days after Congress extended the credit. Taken together with the credit extension, the regulations provide much needed regulatory certainty and clarity that developers require to make significant investment decisions. The final rules are pragmatic and make a number of improvements recommended by ClearPath last summer to the proposed rule. Key clarifications include:

• Reaffirmation of secure geologic storage. The IRS maintained two rigorous options to measure 45Q credit claims in an enhanced oil recovery operation: one through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the other through an international standard (“ISO”). This approach provides critical reporting optionality to developers, based on their preference or ability to comply with either. Both the ISO and EPA pathways require third-party review, monitoring and carbon accounting, and documents made available to federal authorities.
• A reduction in the “lookback” period. The final regulations reduce the ‘lookback period,’ the amount of time credits can be recaptured by the IRS for potential leakage and other contingency events, from five to three years. Noting supportive public comments and scientific evidence, the IRS agreed a 3-year recapture period would sufficiently account for operational risks and improve investor confidence.
• Project aggregation allowed. Congress required 45Q-eligible projects to capture at least 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide each year, depending on their type. The IRS clarified that individual projects could ‘stack’ to meet the minimum capture thresholds, which could be critical for future carbon removal projects and “direct air capture” farms. A single unit would be unlikely to meet the minimum threshold, but could, in aggregate. Similar to wind farms, they could consist of several dozens of modular carbon removal machines.
• New process for carbon utilization crediting. The regulations outline a new process for carbon dioxide to products (“carbon utilization”) projects to qualify for the credit, primarily based on a rigorous life cycle assessment approach. This was the first time life cycle analysis is referenced in the tax code and establishes a strong precedent for potential future credits and programs. Under 45Q’s enabling legislation, Congress made credits only available to carbon utilization projects that had a ‘commercial market.’ The IRS adopted a broad definition of commercial markets instead of providing an exhaustive list of specific products, markets, and services, which will enable new technologies to qualify as markets develop and change.

With clean energy and climate policy likely on the top of the to-do list for the next Congress and Administration, policymakers should pick up where they left off – working on real, bipartisan solutions that accelerate clean energy innovation, not delay it. That means continuing to invest in innovation, streamlining the permitting process, and making it possible for developers to build more expeditiously. Carbon capture hitting the policy trifecta is just the beginning.

 

View more of Our Take and let us know what you think at jaylistens@clearpath.org.