To meet growing energy demand, America needs to build more than it has in a generation, and the policy that gets it there will be shaped by people who understand how building actually happens. That is the idea behind ClearPath’s Conservative Leadership Program (CCLP), which brought nine fellows to Charlotte, North Carolina for its second annual retreat. Over three days, fellows toured a lithium mine and a turbine factory and worked on the leadership skills they will need in Washington. At both stops, the lesson was the same: what happens in Washington decides how fast America builds.

Kings Mountain shows what coordinated permitting can do 

Every energy, critical minerals and infrastructure project starts with permitting. CCLP’s fellows started their visit at Albermarle’s Kings Mountain lithium mine, a site that supplied American lithium for decades before it went quiet in the late 1980s. Albemarle is bringing it back to meet the growing need for a domestic critical minerals supply chain. As a FAST-41 covered project, Kings Mountain’s federal environmental reviews were coordinated by the Permitting Council, and listed on the Permitting Dashboard for transparency. The visit began with Albemarle walking them through how the mine navigated the process.

Albemarle’s lithium mine in Kings Mountain is projected to produce roughly 420,000 metric tons of spodumene concentrate each year, the raw input for a domestic battery supply chain that currently depends heavily on overseas production. When federal reviews are coordinated and tracked in public, projects like Kings Mountain can move. The task for Congress is making that the norm, not the exception.

For the Congressional fellows, the visit connected directly to their day jobs. “I appreciated ClearPath taking the time to make this retreat happen and focus on allowing the CCLP fellows to develop more practical understandings of the energy policy we’re working on in Congress,” said said Max Morgan, one of CCLP’s Congressional fellows. CCLP doesn’t just prepare fellows for the work they will do in the future, but for the work they are doing in Washington right now.

The grid is built in factories before it’s built in the field

At Siemens Energy’s Charlotte hub, Project Engineer Mike Ellis walked the group across the floor where gas turbines, steam turbines, large generators and combustion components are built – machines that will spend decades putting power on grids here and abroad. This part of the supply chain rarely gets attention in Washington, but it is where rising electricity demand meets real manufacturing capacity. Meeting that demand means building here and selling globally, and factories like this one are how America does both.

Good policy needs good leaders

CCLP is designed with the idea that professional development is a key driver in producing the next generation of clean energy champions. The professional skills fellows build in the program are the same skills that will serve them throughout their careers. 

“A big part of CCLP is building a network, not just creating individual fellowship experiences,” said Dana Faught, Director of CCLP. “The retreat gives us dedicated time to invest in them professionally, expose them to parts of the energy space they may not see in their current roles, and help them build relationships with each other.”

Part of that investment came through the SHINE Leadership Accelerator with Nicole Greer, who told the cohort her goal was personal transformation, not a presentation. She asked fellows to start with one question: “What is it like to experience me?” Each fellow charted the highs and lows that shaped them and shared those stories with the group.

Greer also described the concept of “willingness” throughout the sessions during the retreat, and directly tied it to the fellows’ work in energy and in Congress.

“Moving legislation and policy forward can require Plan A, Plan B and sometimes Plan Z,” Greer said. “You have to develop resilience, persistence and, there’s that word again, willingness.”

Plenty of organizations offer young professionals a seat at the table, but fewer take them to the steel-in-the-ground where that policy work becomes real. ClearPath does both.

The opportunity ahead

In Charlotte, fellows saw what it takes for America to build again: a lithium mine returning after decades offline, and a factory floor turning out the turbines and generators that keep the lights on. As they take on bigger roles in Washington and across the energy sector, they’ll bring that experience with them. That’s the point of CCLP – making sure the people who help decide how fast America builds have already seen what building requires.

 

America’s first 250 years were built on energy innovation. From the steam engine to shale gas, American ingenuity has consistently unlocked the next generation of affordable, reliable power. As our nation marks this milestone, the next 250 years demand the same ambition.

AI and data centers, efforts to reshore manufacturing, oilfield electrification and energy security needs are all pushing electricity and industrial demand higher. U.S. electricity demand could rise 35–50 percent by 2040, roughly three Texas-sized grids’ worth of new load. That growth creates an opportunity to deploy reliable, affordable, lower-emissions American technologies at scale, and turn rising demand into a lasting American advantage by innovating faster, building more and competing to win globally.

Now in its fifth year, the Carbon Innovation Forum, hosted by ClearPath and the American Petroleum Institute (API), returned to New York Climate Week, to take on that challenge. The Forum brought government leaders, energy executives, emerging technology companies and investors together around one central theme: how American ingenuity, capital and policy can bring the next generation of energy technologies to market and lower energy costs for Americans.

Senator John Curtis (R-UT) joins fireside chat moderated by ClearPath CEO Jeremy Harrell

---

Winning the Global Energy Race

At the start of this century, U.S. power plants generated roughly three times as much electricity as China. Today, China generates more than twice as much as the United States. The gap extends to the materials that underpin energy and manufacturing: America depends entirely on imports for 13 critical minerals, while China leads production of 20 of the 60 minerals the U.S. Geological Survey deems critical and refines an estimated 70% of the world’s strategic minerals.

The United States has the tools to change that trajectory: abundant resources, deep capital markets, world-leading technical expertise and a culture of innovation. Realizing that potential requires pairing those strengths with the right policies, infrastructure and investment.

Alex Fitzsimmons, Associate Deputy Secretary of Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, joins a fireside chat moderated by ClearPath CEO Jeremy Harrell

---

The LNG Playbook: Innovate, Build, Sell

There is a model for this transformation. In less than a decade, the United States went from loading its first liquified natural gas (LNG) export cargo to becoming the world’s leading LNG exporter, demonstrating what is possible when American engineering, capital, infrastructure and policy move together. U.S. LNG liquefaction capacity is expected to more than double from 2025 levels by 2029, with additional projects planned and under construction.

Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports

Source: Energy Information Agency

That growth was made possible by the shale revolution, enabled in part by decades of U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research and public-private partnerships that advanced technologies such as hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling before industry scaled them.

That model can help unlock the next generation of American energy technologies, from advanced nuclear and next-generation geothermal to critical minerals and carbon capture. The priorities are straightforward: meet rising demand with American energy, modernize infrastructure and supply chains, mobilize capital and turn American innovation into global leadership.

---

Shale Revolution 2.0: Producing More at Home

Energy security begins with making better use of the resources, expertise and infrastructure the United States already has. The oil and gas industry has spent decades building world-leading capabilities in geology, drilling, subsurface engineering and carbon management. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) already shows how that expertise can increase energy production, using captured carbon dioxide (CO2) and pipelines to recover additional oil from mature fields. The same infrastructure and subsurface capabilities can support emerging approaches such as enhanced mineral recovery (EMR), helping recover critical minerals from domestic deposits and unlocking new markets. Scaling both EOR and EMR will require more captured CO2 and the pipelines to move it.

The first shale revolution cemented America as an energy superpower. The next can apply that same subsurface expertise across oil and gas, critical minerals and emerging resources to increase domestic production, strengthen supply chains and reduce dependence on foreign competitors.

Andy Rapp, Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, and Will Jordan, Chief Legal and Policy Officer, EQT Corporation, join a fireside chat moderated by API Vice President of Natural Gas Rob Jennings.

---

Wires and Pipes: Building the Infrastructure America Needs

No single step would do more to let America build than modernized permitting. Electricity and industrial demand are growing faster than the transmission and pipeline systems built to serve them can expand, while the rapid buildout of AI and data centers is placing even greater pressure on existing networks.

Weighted Average Permitting Time for Projects Varies by Sector

Source: BLM NEPA National Register; Breakthrough Institute; Columbia University; USFS NEPA Database; Council on Environmental Quality; EIS Length Database; Federal Permitting Dashboard; Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council: Baseline Performance Schedules; Federal Register: Section 404 Permits; Government Accountability Office; Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; NOAA: EFH Consultation; PNAS; Stanford University; University of Utah; McKinsey & Company

Closing that gap will require developers, regulators, utilities, pipeline operators and hyperscalers to expand and modernize transmission lines and pipelines at the pace demand requires. Permitting is central to that effort. Too often, lengthy and unpredictable processes stand between a viable project and construction, making durable permitting reform essential to building the infrastructure America needs.

---

Mobilizing American Capital

Innovation only matters if promising technologies can reach commercial scale, which requires capital at every stage. Recent initial public offerings by companies such as advanced nuclear firm X-energy and geothermal developer Fervo Energy suggest that markets increasingly see these technologies as serious, scalable responses to rising energy demand.

Jeff McClure, Senior Advisor in the Office of Energy Dominance Financing, U.S. Department of Energy, and Tim Latimer, CEO, Fervo Energy, join a panel moderated by Hillary O’Brien, Managing Director of Clean Power, Natural Resources and Research at ClearPath.

The next challenge is strengthening the pathway from early-stage investment to commercial deployment and public markets. Private capital will remain essential, while federal financing and well-designed public-private partnerships can help reduce risk, support first-of-a-kind projects and attract additional investment. DOE’s Office of Energy Dominance Financing is already playing that role. This year, EDF announced a $17.5 billion conditional loan commitment to accelerate the deployment of 10 large-scale nuclear reactors while leveraging significant private equity from project sponsors.

---

Powering America’s Next 250 Years

Rising energy demand presents a generational opportunity for the United States to innovate fast, build here in America, and sell technologies globally. Doing so will require producing more resources at home, building the infrastructure to move energy where it is needed, giving investors the certainty they need to mobilize capital and scaling American technologies at home and abroad.

Thanks to our speakers:  Senator John Curtis (R-UT); Alex Fitzsimmons, Associate Deputy Secretary of Energy, U.S. Department of Energy; Andy Rapp, Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Energy, U.S. Department of Energy; Jeff McClure, Senior Advisor, Office of Energy Dominance Financing, U.S. Department of Energy; Former Rep. Ryan Costello (R-PA); Savita Bowman, Program Director – Advanced Manufacturing and Carbon Innovation, ClearPath; Neil Chatterjee, Chief Government Affairs, Palmetto; Kristian Schmidt Clausen, Investment Director, AIP Management; John Dabbar, Executive Director, National Petroleum Council; Gavin Dillingham, Executive Advisor, Federal Affairs, SLB; Vishal Gupta, President & Manager, Oxy EOR Ventures; Cameron Halliday, Co-Founder and CEO, Mantel; Jeremy Harrell, CEO, ClearPath and ClearPath Action; Ariel Horowitz, Data Center Energy Lead, Anthropic; Rob Jennings, Vice President of Natural Gas Markets, API; Will Jordan, Chief Legal and Policy Officer, EQT Corporation; Ashley Kang, Senior Director, External Affairs & Communications, Grid United; Tim Latimer, CEO, Fervo Energy; Courtney Loper, Head of Government Relations and Public Affairs, EQT Corporation; Sasha Mackler, Senior Vice President, Global Head of Strategy, ExxonMobil Low Carbon Solutions; Nicholas McMurray, Managing Director – International and Nuclear Policy, ClearPath; Hillary O’Brien, Managing Director – Clean Power, Natural Resources and Research, ClearPath; Aaron Padilla, Vice President of Corporate Policy, API; Todd Schaef, Chief Scientist, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Josh Siegel, Energy Reporter, POLITICO; Amos Snead, Founder and CEO, The DUX Group; Jack Thirolf, Head of Public Policy and External Affairs, NET Power; Alexei Viarruel, Executive Director, Power & Renewables Investment Banking, J.P. Morgan; and Rebecca Winkel, Director, Climate & Sustainability Policy, API.

 

Updated on September 2, 2026. Originally posted on April 23, 2026 by Nicholas McMurray and Natalie Houghtalen

A sweeping modernization effort is now underway at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The agency is advancing dozens of rulemakings touching nearly every aspect of the licensing process: hearings, environmental reviews, fusion, fee recovery, radiation protection, microreactors and more. This moment is not just a burst of regulatory activity. It is the convergence of sustained efforts across multiple timelines driven by years of bipartisan policy, recent executive action and more than a decade of internal NRC Commission and staff modernization activities.

That convergence matters for three reasons. First, it helps explain why the rulemaking docket feels so crowded. Second, much of the current rulemaking reflects the need to be more efficient, effective and predictable. Third, most of these rules have broad, longstanding consensus and have been in process across multiple Congresses and Administrations.

Seen that way, the current moment is about more than regulatory housekeeping. It is a test of whether the United States can translate nearly 10 years of bipartisan legislative and policy momentum into a licensing system capable of enabling predictable deployment timelines and project costs. Many of the rules initiated by one piece of legislation were also affected by subsequent legislation or executive direction. Here are the 10 rules to watch most closely:

---

Initiated by Federal Legislation

These rulemakings largely establish regulations for new commercial technologies such as advanced reactors, fusion machines and microreactors. A predictable, durable pathway for these technologies is necessary to enable broad deployment.

Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act of 2019 (NEIMA)

1. Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors (NRC Rule Page)

• What it is: The creation of a modern licensing pathway for advanced reactors, 10 CFR Part 53, that can accommodate different technologies, designs and operating models.
• Why it matters: The new Part 53 of the NRC’s regulatory code is the opportunity for the NRC to turn risk-informed regulation into a workable path for advanced reactor deployment.
• What’s next: The NRC published the final rule in March 2026.

2. Regulatory Framework for Fusion Machines (NRC Rule Page)

• What it is: A proposed rule to establish a dedicated licensing approach for fusion machines rather than regulating fusion like fission.
• Why it matters: Fusion and fission are inherently different technologies, and accordingly require different regulatory frameworks. 
• What’s next: The NRC published the proposed rule in February 2026. The final rule is expected by the end of 2027.

Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (FRA)

3. Implementation of FRA of 2023 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Amendments (NRC Rule Page)

• What it is: A proposed rule, resulting from a legislatively directed review of the NRC’s environmental review process to align NRC’s regulations with current NEPA requirements.
• Why it matters: The process improvements under the FRA should reduce the review’s timeline and cost by focusing the NRC’s analysis on what falls within the scope of the agency, authorizing the applicant to prepare their own environmental report and only requiring the appropriate level of environmental review. 
• What’s next: The NRC published the proposed rule in July 2026. The final rule is expected in early 2027.

Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy Act of 2024 (ADVANCE)

4. Licensing Requirements for Microreactors and Other Reactors with Comparable Risk Profiles (NRC Rule Page)

• What it is: A proposed rule that would modify many parts of NRC regulations to create a new, more flexible regulatory framework with licensing options for microreactors and other smaller, factory-built, low-risk reactors.
• Why it matters: Microreactors and similar reactors, whose manufacturing and operating profiles do not fit within the traditional large-reactor licensing process, should have a regulatory framework that ensures safety and provides flexibility for that business model.  
• What’s next: The NRC published the proposed rule in May 2026. The final rule is expected early 2027

5. Streamlining Contested Adjudications in Licensing Proceedings (NRC Rule Page)

• What it is: An effort to restructure the contested hearings process at NRC so legal challenges reach timely resolutions that benefit the public, applicants and other stakeholders.
• Why it matters: Contested hearings ensure that major safety and environmental issues are fully considered; process improvements could significantly increase licensing predictability while maintaining the integrity of that process. 
• What’s next: The NRC published the proposed rule in March 2026. The final rule is expected late 2026.

---

Initiated by Executive Order 14300

These rulemakings, initiated by EO 14300 signed in May 2025, reflect the administration’s interest in the widespread deployment of new nuclear reactors.

6. Modernizing Reactor Licensing, Safety Oversight, and Siting Practices (NRC Rule Page)

• What it is: An umbrella modernization effort to revisit how a multitude of NRC rules and guidance documents interact across the full reactor lifecycle.
• Why it matters: A holistic rewrite could matter more than any single rule if it successfully reduces friction or differences between licensing, oversight and siting requirements.
• What’s next: The NRC published the proposed rule in June 2026. The final rule is expected in early 2027

7. NRC Reviews of Reactor Designs Previously Authorized by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) or Department of War (DOW) (NRC Rule Page)

• What it is: An effort to allow the NRC to better leverage safety reviews and operational data from existing DOE or DOW reactor authorization records when licensing through an NRC process.
• Why it matters: Leveraging prior technical reviews and operational experience could reduce duplicative review activities and enable commercial applicants to move through the licensing process more efficiently. 
• What’s next: The NRC published the proposed rule in April 2026. The final rule is expected late 2026.

8. Reforming and Modernizing the NRC’s Radiation Protection Framework (NRC Rule Page)

• What it is: A broad reevaluation of the NRC’s radiation protection framework, including the assumptions and standards that shape design and operation requirements for all radiation-related activities required by the NRC.
• Why it matters: Because radiation protection underpins many NRC regulatory requirements, this rule could affect the cost, operations and public perception of all activities regulated by the NRC.
• What’s next: The NRC published the proposed rule in June 2026. The final rule is expected early 2027

9. A Focused Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) (NRC Rule Page)

• What it is: The ACRS is another layer of safety within, but separate from, the NRC staff that reviews reactor license applications and other regulatory activities. A focused ACRS process would reduce the number of routine reviews and concentrate committee attention on novel or safety-significant issues.
• Why it matters: Without focusing the ACRS on the most consequential issues related to new reactor licensing, the committee’s expertise and resources would be spread too thin and the committee’s review process could become a procedural bottleneck to new reactor deployment.
• What’s next: The NRC is expected to publish the final rule in October 2026.

---

Initiated Internally by the NRC

The NRC is not just reacting to outside mandates. It is also trying to reshape the broader regulatory framework on its own terms.

10. Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) for Licensing of New Nuclear Reactors

• What it is: For any new reactor, a GEIS addresses the recurring environmental issues for all plants and enables the site-specific analysis to focus only on unique issues. 
• Why it matters: Initiated in 2020, the NRC staff estimate that this would significantly reduce analysis, increase predictability and reduce the costs of environmental reviews by between 20% and 45%, depending on the project.
• What’s next: The NRC published the final rule in April 2026.

 

America is asking its grid to do more than ever, and a two hundred and fifty year old tradition of innovation is how we will meet this moment. Data centers, advanced manufacturing and a wave of reindustrialization are driving the fastest jump in electricity demand in decades. As Congress considers options to address this growing demand, ClearPath’s educational series, the Clean Energy Innovation Academy (CEIA), took nine U.S. House Republican staff to the Philadelphia region to see firsthand the infrastructure powering America: the grid that moves power across state lines and the plants that generate it around the clock. At every stop, the lesson was the same. For America to lead, we must innovate fast, build here and sell globally.

The grid is where reliability is won or lost: The delegation started at PJM Interconnection, the largest power grid in North America. From its control room outside Philadelphia, PJM balances supply and demand in real time for more than 67 million people across 13 states and D.C., coordinating roughly 180 gigawatts of generating capacity, 1,400 generating sources and 88,000 miles of high-voltage transmission lines. First, staff received an overview of PJM’s operations, including their role in planning the regional transmission system and how they are responding to surging demand growth. Then, the group moved to the control room to observe PJM’s grid operators in action, and learned about their complex responsibilities.  Following the tour, staff participated in a discussion offering insight into how PJM’s transmission planning process works, including the role of competition in driving creative solutions and deployment of innovative grid technologies. Watching PJM staff run their system in real time drove home a point that rarely makes headlines: having transmission lines capable of bringing more power online and moving power to where it is needed can make or break grid reliability. The interconnection queue and pace of transmission development now sit at the center of whether America can meet rising demand. That makes getting the process right one of the highest-impact moves in energy policy today.

America’s nuclear fleet is a platform to build on: Following the visit to PJM, staff traveled to Constellation’s Limerick Clean Energy Center in Pottstown, PA. The nuclear power plant runs two Boiling Water Reactors that produce a combined 2.3 gigawatts of carbon-free power (enough for more than 1.7 million homes) 24/7. Constellation is the nation’s largest producer of emissions-free energy, operating 21 reactors across the country, and plants like Limerick are increasingly central to conversations about serving data centers and new factories. Limerick staff briefed the group on the basics of nuclear energy, how the plant operates, its planned uprate and Constellation’s efforts on the Three Mile Island restart. Then, they toured the plant, beginning with the outside grounds, which included the facility’s two cooling towers, spent fuel dry casks, emergency operations areas and transmission interconnection substation. They were then led inside to see the plant’s generators, turbines and control room, where they were able to discuss directly with operators on how to advance nuclear energy in the United States. With energy demand projected to grow 35 to 50 percent by 2040, plants like Limerick show how far American ingenuity can expand on a proven asset. That same expertise is the launchpad for what comes next: the new large reactors and advanced designs that will power the next era of American growth.

Innovation means modernizing the rules, not just the hardware: Technology is only half the equation. Staff also heard from innovators like Tapestry and an industry expert at R Street Institute on how the best technology in the world stalls if the rules around it do not keep up. Getting transmission planning, cost allocation, siting and interconnection right, as well as navigating an archaic permitting process, often decides whether a project ever breaks ground. Without swift action to match the speed of permitting to American innovation, the country risks leaving new generation and transmission stuck waiting rather than on the grid.

The opportunity ahead

Philadelphia is a fitting place to make the point. Two hundred fifty years after the country was founded, the question is the same one it has always been: can America build what it needs to power the next era? Constellation’s Limerick Clean Energy Center and PJM Interconnection are proof that we can, if we let America build.The path forward is to let them work, to modernize the rules and invest in the fleet and wires already delivering power, keeping American energy leadership strong at home and abroad. Innovate fast, build here, sell globally: the demand is real, and the opportunity has never been greater.

Since 2014, ClearPath has existed to strengthen American innovation and develop solutions that reduce energy emissions. In addition to groundbreaking, forward-looking ideas, progress depends on people who can turn those ideas into tangible, durable policy. 

The ClearPath Conservative Leadership Program (CCLP) aspires to help foster, educate and place rising professionals in the offices and organizations shaping America’s energy future across Capitol Hill. Cultivating the next generation of emerging energy talent complements ClearPath’s mission to advance America’s energy leadership and deliver clean power worldwide.  

CCLP marked its third year of professional development programming with “Powering Your Energy Career: Connections and Conversations for Young Energy Professionals in Washington,” bringing together interns, fellows and early-career staff working in and around clean energy policy. Throughout the event, attendees were able to hear directly from leaders across multiple agencies and energy institutions who shared advice and lessons from their own experience in the energy sector, along with the range of career possibilities available throughout the field. 

Programming throughout the morning included a full agenda of a fireside chat, hands-on activities and an expert panel discussion. All of the sessions were designed to give the participants different perspectives on a career in energy and the importance of pursuing a career in the field.  

Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT) and former Congressman Greg Walden opened the day with a fireside chat on their own paths to energy leadership. Both emphasized that success as a young professional in Washington depends on a strong work ethic and the ability to adapt within an environment as fast-paced as Washington, D.C. In the discussion, Rep. Maloy reminded the audience that they do not need to have their full career path figured out, but rather show up for the work in front of them and stay open to what the journey might present.

Zack Roday, a Partner at Ascent Media, presented on professional presence and the art of the elevator pitch. He walked participants through the fundamentals that shape a strong first impression to prepare for any networking opportunity. Participants practiced these skills during a networking session which featured the opportunity to connect with representatives from ACC, CRES, AEI and C3 Solutions.

Hillary O’Brien, Managing Director of Clean Power, Natural Resources and Research at ClearPath, led the third session, Demystifying AI, which broke down data centers in plain terms: what they are, how they function and why they’ve become central to the conversation around rising power demand. This understanding will serve participants well as data centers continue to shape energy policy debates.

The day closed with a panel of speakers who have built careers across different corners of the energy field: Matthew Middleton, Principal Deputy Communications Director and Director of Research at the Department of the Interior, Lahra Walker, Special Advisor at the Advanced Research Project Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) at the Department of Energy; and Emily Johnson, Managing Director of External Affairs at ClearPath. Each spoke to their own path in and out of Capitol Hill, and the group’s consistent message was that there’s no single route into this line of work, what matters more is staying grounded in the moment and clear on what drives you once you are in it.

All three panelists started in a different place, on the Hill, in a fellowship and in the private sector, yet all three have gone on to make a real mark in the energy field. Overall, the clear message participants were able to take away from the day is, there is a space for you in the energy sector, and the spot for you is more attainable than you think.

CCLP seeks to find and place the next wave of energy talent and give them a start at turning their interest in clean energy into a career. This event and the CCLP program aim to accelerate the careers of America’s most capable emerging talent. And that is how America leads on energy innovation.

If you are on the Hill and your office would benefit from having a ClearPath fellow in your office, reach out to Dana Faught at dana@clearpath.org to learn more.