From Energy Act to IPO: Federal Energy R&D Programs Deliver Results

The next phase of America’s energy future made its Wall Street debut this spring with resounding success. Within just a few weeks, two of the country’s most promising next-generation energy companies made their entrances to the public markets through initial public offerings (IPOs) of their corporate stock. X-energy, a Maryland-based designer of high-temperature gas reactors and fuel, raised over $1 billion in what became the largest advanced nuclear IPO on record. Fervo Energy, the Houston-based pioneer of enhanced geothermal systems, followed with an upsized IPO offering that raised $2.2 billion, making it the largest-ever clean energy IPO. In an industry where billion-dollar IPOs are exceptionally rare, to see two in quick succession is a sign of strong investor demand for firm, dispatchable, carbon-free generation as rising electricity demand reshapes the American power sector.

These financing milestones were both enabled by forward-looking federal research and development (R&D). Both X-energy and Fervo are products of the Energy Act of 2020, a landmark bipartisan federal legislation that reauthorized critical Department of Energy (DOE) innovation programs like:

Early-stage investments from ARPA-E laid the groundwork for X-energy’s TRISO fuel in 2020. When the Department of Energy selected X-energy in 2020 as one of two ARDP awardees, the program provided up to 50% cost-sharing for a commercial-scale project. That federal partnership enabled X-energy to complete the engineering and basic design of its reactor and fuel fabrication facility, navigate licensing with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and recently begin construction on its TRISO-X fuel fabrication facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. X-energy and Dow Chemical are awaiting NRC approval of their construction permit application for the four-unit, 320-MWe Xe-100 plant at Dow’s manufacturing facility in Seadrift, Texas.

Fervo Energy’s story is similar. Founded in Houston in 2017, Fervo has transformed the next-generation geothermal industry using tools pioneered by the oil and gas sector during the shale revolution. Fervo’s technique uses applied horizontal drilling, hydraulic fracturing and fiber-optic sensing to unlock resources that were once considered too difficult or too expensive to tap at scale.

Fervo Energy’s Publicly Announced Funding to Date and Most Notable Investors

Source: Rystad Energy

Like X-energy, ARPA-E grants to Fervo Energy as early as 2019 paved the way for the company’s dynamic growth. Fervo’s founders also benefitted from DOE-aligned fellowship programs, including Activate and Cyclotron Road, a DOE lab-embedded entrepreneurship program at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, unlocking critical expertise to validate the company’s technology at its earliest stages.

The results speak for themselves. Between 2022 and 2025, Fervo reduced drilling times by approximately 80%. The Utah FORGE site helped unlock these commercial breakthroughs, allowing the company to develop and test the stimulation and reservoir engineering techniques that now define its approach. As a result, Fervo’s flagship Cape Station project in Utah is on track to begin delivering electricity this year.

Federal R&D and Demo Funding Catalyzes Tech up the S-Curve

Today, most of the Energy Act of 2020 programs that made Fervo and X-energy’s first-of-a-kind projects possible are expiring or have already expired. As energy demand continues to grow, Congress has the opportunity to reauthorize these programs that will help America continue to lead the world in energy innovation, win the AI race and meet rising energy demand. In the six years since the Energy Act of 2020, much has changed in the energy sector and DOE needs the most up-to-date set of tools to support exciting new technologies like quantum computing, enhanced grid technologies and energy storage. These IPOs should be the green light needed to recommit to fully authorizing and funding DOE’s R&D apparatus for the AI era.

The innovation programs authorized under the Energy Act of 2020 are the engine of American energy dominance for the next generation of firm clean power technologies. Capital markets have proven the model works. Now, the conditions are right for a similar bipartisan Congressional effort to unlock the next Fervo, the next X-energy, and ensure the next energy tech unicorn has the same federal R&D foundation to build on.

 

How Trump’s Nuclear Orders Sparked America’s Nuclear Revival (The National Interest)

This op-ed was originally published by The National Interest on May 21, 2026. Click here to read the entire piece.

Public and private investment is accelerating reactor deployment, rebuilding the domestic fuel supply chain, and laying the foundation for a long-awaited American nuclear renaissance.

One year ago, President Donald Trump signed four executive orders (EOs) that charted a new course to rebuild America’s nuclear industry. Together, they represent the most ambitious steps any president has taken to advance nuclear energy in the 21st century, aiming to deliver the long-promised nuclear renaissance. 

Trump’s Nuclear Executive Orders Set Ambitious Goals for US Nuclear Energy 

These executive orders established a framework to accelerate reactor deployment, rebuild the nuclear fuel supply chain, and restore US competitiveness globally through agencies such as the US Export-Import Bank (EXIM) to finance major American projects abroad. They provided specific, measurable targets to rapidly test new reactor designs, begin construction on 10 large reactors by 2030, quadruple US nuclear capacity to 400 gigawatts (GW) by 2050, address fuel shortages and waste disposal, streamline the regulatory environment, and rebuild a globally competitive industry capable of outcompeting China and Russia.

In this era of rising demand, the federal government cannot constrain nuclear development; all levers of government are increasingly working to enable more nuclear development. President Trump’s orders are more than just headlines; they’re part of a cohesive public-private strategy to accelerate the American nuclear industry. 

Big Tech and Industry Are Powering Advanced Nuclear Reactor Deployment 

Many of these projects are private sector-driven. Some of America’s largest companies, including Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Dow, and others, are turning to both existing and new nuclear energy to meet skyrocketing power needs.

Today, some of these companies are supporting commercial advanced nuclear reactor projects under construction in Wyoming, Texas, and Tennessee. Furthermore, several companies are also now on track to reach first criticality through the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Reactor Pilot Program, and the Department of Defense (DOD) is actively moving to deploy microreactors across military installations through the Janus program and Project Pele. 

These programs provide a critical opportunity to demonstrate and test advanced technologies. Beyond that, roughly 8 GW of new reactors are planned, another 2 GW are coming back online through plant restarts, and up to 5 GW more are being explored through uprates at existing facilities.

Click here to read the full article

How Surface Transportation Reauthorization Can Drive America’s Next Materials Revolution (American Affairs)

This op-ed was originally published by American Affairs on May 20, 2026. Click here to read the entire piece.

The Interstate Highways run through America as asphalt and concrete strands, binding the nation together, facilitating interstate commerce, and enabling a uniquely mobile American culture. They are fundamental to the operating system of American life, yet few appreciate their scale as the largest public works project undertaken in U.S. history and one of the few engineered structures visible from space.

America’s Interstate system emerged in its current physical and administrative form in response to the technological innovation of mass manufactured automobiles, defense needs amid the specter of the Cold War, and political compromises among different interest groups. Development started 110 years ago, with the passage of the Federal-Aid Road Act of 1916, marking the first time the federal government provided support for nationwide roadbuilding. The Interstate Highway System as we know it today was subsequently authorized when President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 into law.

Seventy years after the passage of that milestone law, the expiry of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) in September 2026 offers an opportunity to bring Eisenhower’s transportation legacy into the twenty-first century. As surface transportation legislation is due for reauthorization at the end of the 2026 fiscal year, Congress has an opportunity to leverage this process in order to advance industrial policy goals across a host of fields; foremost among these is a materials revolution in the raw materials and production processes used to make cement, concrete, and asphalt—the building blocks of American transportation and building infrastructure. This revolution can be accelerated by the scaling up of domestically manufactured, low-carbon variants of these essential materials.

Congress should approach this surface transportation reauthorization by channeling the intent of the 1956 law, which bolstered economic growth and national security. It should be noted, however, that utilizing surface transportation in this broader stimulative way would represent a departure from contemporary approaches to highway legislation.

In recent authorizations, debates centered on issues such as resolving the fiscal solvency of the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) and expanding federal support for multi-modal transportation (including as light rail and mass bus transit). In other words, authorizations tended to focus on what to build, how fast to build, and how to finance the system. But 2026 will push Congress to confront the question of what we build with; the materials revolution provides an answer and pursuing it will lead to valuable supply chain and emissions reductions benefits.

Click here to read the full article

Energy Financing Power: China’s Strategy and a Path Forward for the United States (American Affairs)

This op-ed was originally published by American Affairs on May 20, 2026. Click here to read the entire piece.

The United States faces a growing strategic challenge: China has emerged as the world’s dominant energy financier, outpacing the United States nearly ten to one in global markets. China’s growing influence not only directly challenges U.S. strategic interests but also excludes American businesses from immense economic opportunities in the world’s largest foreign markets, such as Brazil and India.

The United States should not try to out-subsidize China, but true American energy dominance requires global market leadership. To expand global markets for U.S. businesses and compete strategically with China, the United States needs to sharpen its export and development finance tools and coordinate them more effectively. For instance, the U.S. Development Finance Corporation (DFC) should be empowered with greater scale and flexibility to pursue long-term investments that strengthen supply chains and national security. The U.S. Export-Import Bank (EXIM) should have the capacity to back larger American-made energy projects and direct financing toward a wider set of energy technologies. Additionally, the establishment of Energy Security Compacts (ESCs), modeled on the Millennium Challenge Corporation’s (MCC) existing framework, can leverage these financing tools to align agencies on strategy, support allies, and make energy a pillar of American industrial and economic policy.

China’s Foreign Finance Toolkit

On the morning of July 17, 2022, the floating oil and gas platform Almirante Barroso set sail from the Dalian shipyard in Liaoning province, People’s Republic of China (PRC). After months at sea, it moored above the Búzios oilfield off the coast of Brazil. Petrobras, Brazil’s national oil utility, and two Chinese oil majors, China National Offshore Oil Corporation (cnooc) and China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), partnered under a joint venture to develop the Búzios field. The China Development Bank (CDB) also provided $1.5 billion in project finance to Petrobras for the Almirante Barroso, the sixth of eleven planned Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading Units (FPSOs) to operate in the Búzios.

Global Chinese investment in Brazil and in global energy markets extends far beyond the Búzios oilfield. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has an array of policy and financial tools that it uses to secure diplomatic influence, strengthen supply chains for domestic Chinese manufacturing, and gain physical control of strategic assets in partner countries. The energy industry is a focus for the PRC because of its importance for the domestic Chinese economy and its national security implications abroad.

Readers of American Affairs will be familiar with the PRC’s negotiated compromise between private “free market” activity and state-directed resource planning. This “state capitalist” system is supported by financial institutions with various degrees of distance from the central CCP command. Closest to the ruling party are the policy banks: the CDB and the Export-Import Bank of China (chexim). Outside their official policy organs, the PRC has stakes in a variety of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), including the four largest Chinese banks and some of the world’s largest energy companies, which receive strategic direction from the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (sasac), the arm of the PRC government that manages its ownership of private businesses. Furthest removed are private PRC-flagged companies that are not state-owned, like BYD and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL), which have no direct connection to the CCP. After years of decentralization dating back to Deng Xiaoping’s tenure, Xi Jinping has aggressively reasserted control in Chinese capital markets, wielding this diverse toolkit of institutions in support of PRC strategy.

Since the turn of the century, the PRC has taken its state-owned system abroad, using the full range of its institutional toolkit. These efforts include, but are by no means limited to, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the PRC’s state-directed development program focused on the Eurasian continent. The PRC’s policy and state-owned banks also engage in sophisticated lending and energy investing alongside leading Western financial institutions.

Until recently, U.S. policymakers and the American public have been left in the dark about the extent of the PRC’s state-owned foreign investments, in part because of the complicated web of institutions that invest on behalf of the PRC. Existing data publication efforts from the AidData lab at the College of William and Mary, the American Enterprise Institute, and others are robust but limited in scope. It was possible to track individual deals from PRC entities, but no single data source existed for all PRC state-owned finance.

There was also a severe lack of information about U.S. investments in international public energy finance. No single source of public data existed on the activities of EXIM, DFC, and the various agencies offering assistance and foreign aid.

New research from Casey Kelly, Justin Williams, Jacob Kincer, and myself at ClearPath has solved these data gaps, which allows us to present comprehensive totals of U.S. and Chinese international public energy finance. Since 2015, China has outspent the United States $446 billion to $45 billion in foreign public energy finance. Without policy action, the United States stands to lose its competitive edge in foreign energy markets, which will hurt American manufacturers and cede strategic ground to the PRC. Policymakers should sharpen the policy toolkit to strengthen the American industrial base, lead the world in energy innovation, and prevail against the CCP. This article will utilize Brazil and India as case studies to analyze PRC and U.S. strategies and chart a path forward.

Click here to read the full article

Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) 101

In 2016, the United States exported its first cargo of liquefied natural gas (LNG) produced from the lower 48 states – marking the start of America’s rise as a major global LNG supplier. The U.S. is the world’s largest LNG exporter since 2022, cementing America’s role as a reliable energy supplier to allies and trading partners across the globe. 

The next chapter of U.S. leadership is already underway. Developers plan to more than double U.S. liquefaction capacity, adding an estimated 13.9 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day (Bcf/d) between 2025 and 2029, with additional projects planned and under construction. 

America’s LNG leadership strengthens national security, supports high-paying jobs at home and expands markets for abundant U.S. natural gas. LNG can also help lower global emissions in certain markets by providing a reliable alternative to more carbon-intensive fuels, particularly in fast-growing economies where energy demand continues to rise. As global demand for affordable and dependable power increases, LNG offers a practical pathway to advance energy security and support global emission reductions.

North America Liquefied Natural Gas Export Capacity By Projects (2016-2029)

What is LNG?

LNG is natural gas in liquid form. Natural gas is cooled to approximately -260°F and compressed until it becomes a liquid. This process reduces the fuel’s volume by roughly 600 times, making it far more efficient to store and transport over long distances across the ocean. Once delivered to its destination, LNG is warmed back into a gaseous state and used for electricity generation, manufacturing, heating and other industrial purposes.

America’s LNG strength is rooted in an unmatched domestic resource base. Fueled by the shale revolution and advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, the U.S. now produces roughly one-quarter of the world’s natural gas – surpassing Russia in 2009. This abundant supply has enabled the U.S. to scale LNG exports while continuing to meet growing domestic demand.

LNG Value Chain

The LNG value chain is a fully integrated system that moves American natural gas from domestic production fields to consumers around the world. It includes natural gas production, pipeline transportation, liquefaction, shipping, regasification and end use, delivering reliable energy for power generation, heating and manufacturing.

LNG Transport Cycle

The Strategic Value of LNG

LNG delivers tangible benefits for the U.S. and its allies – strengthening energy security, driving economic growth, creating jobs, supporting reliable power and helping lower global emissions

1. Global Energy Security and U.S. Energy Leadership – LNG is a cornerstone of American energy security and geopolitical leadership. Global demand for natural gas and LNG is expected to remain strong for decades as countries seek affordable, clean and reliable energy sources. Natural gas demand is projected to increase by 20% through 2035 and continue rising through 2050, and the global LNG market will grow from approximately 560 bcm in 2024 to 880 bcm in 2035 and more than 1,020 bcm by 2050. Much of this growth will be driven by power generation and heavy industry, particularly in emerging markets experiencing rapid industrialization and economic growth.

U.S. LNG exports have already helped Europe reduce dependence on Russian gas supplies following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. In Asia, U.S. LNG can strengthen the energy security of key allies such as Japan while offering growing economies an alternative to less reliable suppliers. During periods of geopolitical instability and supply disruption, access to reliable U.S. LNG helps allies maintain affordable energy supplies, economic stability and energy security.

2. Economic Growth and U.S. Jobs – LNG is a major driver of American economic growth and high-quality jobs across the country. Since 2016, the U.S. LNG industry has contributed $400 billion to U.S. GDP and supported hundreds of thousands of high-quality American jobs. U.S. LNG exports are now projected to support an annual average of 495,000 jobs and generate $1.3 trillion in U.S. GDP through 2040. Importantly, 37% of those jobs and 30% of GDP benefits are expected to occur in non-natural gas-producing states, underscoring LNG’s broad economic benefits. From natural gas production and pipeline construction to export terminals, manufacturing, engineering and port activity, LNG strengthens local economies across the U.S.

3. National Security – Energy security is national security. Our adversaries weaponize it and our allies understand their acute vulnerabilities, especially following recent supply disruptions amid wars in Ukraine and Iran. U.S. LNG exports enhance America’s geopolitical leverage by helping allies diversify supply, reducing the influence of hostile countries and creating long-term commercial partnerships that bolster broader diplomatic and security relationships. The Trump Administration has taken steps to bring new LNG capacity online, including through support of large capital projects like the Alaska LNG Pipeline, which DOE Secretary Wright recently noted as his number one infrastructure priority.

How U.S. LNG Can Lower Global Energy Emissions

American LNG Producers Are Some of the Cleanest in the World

U.S. LNG is among the cleanest in the world and can help lower global emissions, especially in fast-growing economies where energy demand is rising rapidly. In many markets, the real-world choice is between LNG and more emissions-intensive foreign fuels. In those cases, American LNG can deliver meaningful emissions benefits while improving energy security.

A growing body of research from organizations such as the International Energy Agency, S&P Global, Wood Mackenzie and National Energy Technology Laboratory shows the emissions benefits of U.S. LNG exports. According to S&P Global, bringing approximately 40 million tons per annum (Mtpa) of additional U.S. LNG projects online could reduce global emissions by roughly 324 million tons of CO2e between 2028 and 2040 compared to likely alternative supply sources. 

Reliable energy access is also essential to building lower-emission power systems. Natural gas provides dispatchable power that can back up intermittent renewables, meet peak demand and support growing grids. In many regions, such as Asia and Africa, LNG can help enable greater deployment of emerging low-carbon technologies.

Global LNG demand is expected to grow for decades. The question is whether that demand is met by the United States or by alternative suppliers with higher emissions, less transparency or fewer strategic benefits for America and its allies.

LNG Regulatory Landscape

Multiple U.S. federal agencies play important and complementary roles in approving LNG projects, ensuring safety, facilitating exports and advancing U.S. energy interests abroad.

Policy Recommendations

1. Permitting Reform for Energy Infrastructure – Timely, transparent, and predictable permitting is essential for U.S. energy security and leadership, and LNG infrastructure plays an important role by ensuring American energy can reach global markets and meet rising demand. Export terminals are large, capital-intensive projects that often take years to permit and construct, meaning there is significant lead time before new American supply can reach global markets. Federal reviews for LNG terminals, export authorizations and interstate natural gas pipelines should be completed efficiently and transparently.

2. Modernize Pipeline Infrastructure – LNG exports depend on a strong domestic pipeline network capable of safely and reliably delivering natural gas to export terminals. Policymakers should support next-generation pipeline materials, advanced monitoring systems and infrastructure upgrades that improve reliability and allow pipelines to keep pace with rising demand. Legislation such as the Next Generation Pipelines Research and Development Act would expand federal RD&D efforts for advanced pipeline technologies, materials and systems that can strengthen U.S. energy infrastructure. 

3. Strengthen Methane Monitoring, Detection, and Measurement – American natural gas is among the lowest emissions in the world, but increasingly, global buyers are requiring verified methane emissions data to access their markets. Nearly 60% of U.S. LNG exports go to countries with methane regulations, and forthcoming requirements in the European Union will require verified emissions data for market access. Without credible measurement tools, U.S. producers risk losing competitiveness in key export markets.

To address this challenge, Congress could use the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) reauthorization to direct NASA to develop a science-based national strategy to assess current and emerging methane monitoring capabilities. Leveraging NASA’s world-class satellite expertise, in partnership with private industry, can help close critical data gaps, improve the transparency and reliability of methane measurement and strengthen the credibility of U.S. energy exports. A coordinated strategy would help ensure American LNG remains the global standard while reinforcing U.S. energy security, market access and global competitiveness.

4. Expand U.S. LNG Exports Through Strategic LNG Partnerships – The Trump Administration has made historic bilateral LNG agreements with partners such as the European Union and Japan. Initiatives such as the U.S. Trade and Development Agency–U.S. Chamber of Commerce Global Gas Initiative are also helping to expand market access by supporting project development, facilitating partnerships and advancing infrastructure deployment in emerging economies. To build on this momentum, Congress can help translate non-binding commitments into more durable and strategic partnerships. Formal LNG partnerships would create a durable framework to deepen engagement with key regions, involve private-sector buyers and developers, coordinate on emissions data and regulatory standards and leverage tools such as EXIM to support import infrastructure abroad. A more coordinated partnership model, codified by Congress, would strengthen long-term market access for U.S. LNG exporters while advancing our allies’ energy security and American geopolitical leadership.

Energizing the Special Relationship: The U.S.-UK Power Play

Speaking before a joint session of the United States Congress this week, King Charles III delivered a pointed message: “Our alliance cannot rest on past achievements.” Nowhere is that more true than in energy.  The next chapter of the U.S.-UK relationship is being written right now, not in ink, but in megawatts, reactor designs and critical mineral supply chains.

A partnership that is producing results

Last September’s Atlantic Partnership for Advanced Nuclear Energy was a watershed moment. Not just another diplomatic communiqué, but a commitment to American energy dominance and British industrial revival. By targeting a reduction in reactor licensing timelines from four years to two, the U.S. and UK are finally removing the regulatory anchors that have held back private capital from nuclear for decades.

U.S. companies have already responded:

These projects are more than infrastructure; they are early signals of a deeper alignment. They prove that American energy leadership depends on a simple, relentless operating model. Innovate fast, build here and sell into global markets.

The stakes: Competing with state-owned rivals

Innovation is important, and the U.S. and U.K. are some of the best at it. But ultimately, leadership is measured in what gets built. The nuclear race is a zero-sum game. Since 2000, Russia and China have built 64 reactors just in their own countries, with another 31 either built or under construction around the globe. In the same time, U.S. companies have built seven, and the U.K. has built none. Every reactor sale locks in a strategic relationship for up to a century. If the U.S. and UK don’t lead, Beijing and Moscow will.

China and Russia Are Winning the Global Reactor Race

Source: Internal ClearPath Tracking

China’s massive state subsidies and standardized designs have already made it the partner of choice for many developing nations. That does not mean that we need to out-subsidize China; we can out-innovate. The U.S.-UK partnership offers a credible alternative. Better technology, greater transparency and the backing of the world’s two most mature capital markets, dynamic private sectors and trusted nuclear regulators. That’s a compelling case, but only if American firms can compete on financing and speed, not just technology.

From framework to foundation

The Atlantic Partnership and other complementary efforts like the U.S.-UK Critical Minerals Memorandum of Understanding signed in February 2026 are strong starts, but frameworks without permanent legal architecture can be unwound. The next logical step is a formal energy security agreement with the U.S.-UK trade framework solidifying energy at its core.


This means three concrete things:

The messenger and the moment

As King Charles III reminded Congress this week, quoting President Lincoln, “the world may little know what we say but will never forget what we do.” 250 years ago, America declared independence from Britain. Now both nations have the chance to declare something new. Share independence from global energy volatility. That declaration won’t be signed with a quill. It will be built by American companies, in allied markets, locked in by the permanent legal architecture that no future administration can quietly unwind.

 

Carbon Utilization 101

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) is a resource to be harnessed, from oil production and agriculture to critical minerals and advanced materials. Carbon is a fundamental building block of modern society. For decades, the United States has used carbon dioxide for energy production through enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Today, American innovators are expanding carbon’s role as a valuable domestic resource by using it to produce fuels, strengthen supply chains and create the materials that underpin our economy.

The market for products utilizing CO2 is rapidly emerging as a key part of America’s industrial and energy sectors, with global revenue projected to exceed $1 trillion by 2040. As carbon capture and removal technologies scale, increasing the supply of CO2, new utilization opportunities are emerging across the U.S. economy. Countries like China are investing in carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) technologies and advancing demonstration-level projects, positioning themselves to dominate markets for products that rely on CO2 as a key input. To remain competitive, the U.S. must continue to support innovation and scale carbon utilization technologies at home, leveraging our existing capabilities to compete and lead globally.

Carbon Capture and Utilization

What is Carbon Utilization?

Carbon utilization, also known as carbon use or carbon conversion, refers to the use of captured CO2 from industrial sources or the atmosphere as a feedstock to produce fuels, materials, chemicals and other valuable commodities. In practice, CO₂ can serve as a building-block ingredient to create new products or as a working fluid in industrial processes that improve efficiency and unlock additional resource recovery. CO₂ can be used across a wide range of applications and sectors, supporting the production of goods that are central to the U.S. economy.

Carbon Utilization in the United States: Projects

Carbon Use Projects in the United States: Announced, In Development, and Operational

Types of Carbon Uses

American Energy Leadership: Enhanced Oil Recovery

Enhanced oil recovery using carbon dioxide (CO2 -EOR) strengthens domestic oil production, boosting energy security at home and for U.S. allies by reducing reliance on oil from adversarial nations. CO2-EOR is the most established use of captured CO2 and a key contributor to domestic oil production, enabling the recovery of 245,000 barrels of oil per day in the U.S. This process injects CO2 into mature oil fields to boost oil production and extend the life of existing assets, improving resource recovery in a cost-effective manner. During this process, much of the CO2 remains permanently stored underground, while the rest is recycled in a closed loop to support additional recovery. To make this possible, U.S operators inject approximately 68 million tons of CO2 annually for CO2-EOR.

Looking ahead, rising energy demand from reshored manufacturing, AI and data centers, combined with a growing global need for reliable American oil, will require a stable, scalable supply of domestic energy resources. Next-generation CO2-EOR technologies have the potential to unlock more than 60 billion barrels of additional oil using advanced techniques, including those that could require the injection of larger volumes of CO2. Ensuring access to a reliable supply of CO2 will be critical to sustaining and expanding this production, supporting domestic and global energy security.

Critical Mineral Independence

Similar to EOR, where CO2 can be used to bolster energy security, CO2 can also be used to extract additional critical minerals from the earth through what is often described as CO2-based mineral recovery. At ClearPath, we refer to these processes and technologies as Enhanced Mineral Recovery (EMR).

The U.S. remains 100 percent reliant on imports for 13 of the 60 minerals deemed “critical” by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and EMR technologies could support domestic critical mineral production and strengthen U.S. supply chains.

EMR encompasses a range of technologies that use advanced techniques to retrieve more minerals and unlock previously inaccessible resources. These approaches can be deployed both underground (in-situ) and above ground (ex-situ) and are beginning to receive early-stage support from the Department of Energy (DOE) through programs such as ARPA-E’s MINER program.

In in-situ applications, compressed CO2, typically dissolved in water, is injected into deep rock layers where critical minerals are found. The CO2 then reacts with the minerals in the rocks to break them down and release the target minerals. While the CO2 is permanently stored underground, the leached minerals are pumped back to the surface, giving us access to additional critical minerals that were once locked underground.

In ex-situ applications, CO2 accelerates chemical reactions that extract valuable minerals or convert materials from industrial byproducts like mine tailings or steel slag into stable compounds in processing facilities, improving recovery rates. For example, CO2 can enhance the recovery of phosphoric acid, a key input for fertilizers, from phosphate, which was recently designated a U.S. critical mineral. 

Agriculture Innovation

By 2050, the world will need up to 60% more food to support a growing global population, making agricultural productivity and innovation more important than ever. Agricultural innovators are leveraging captured CO2 to support controlled growing environments and develop fertilizers and other inputs that increase crop yields, improve efficiency and create new revenue opportunities.

For decades, farmers have used supplemental CO2 in greenhouses to enhance plant growth, significantly increasing plant yields. For example, by increasing CO2 levels in highly-controlled environments like greenhouses, traditionally via compressed CO2 tanks or CO2 generators, farmers can increase crop yields by 40-100%. In addition, CO₂ can be converted into chemicals for different soil amendments that provide a wide array of agricultural benefits. Specifically, CO2 is used to produce urea fertilizer, which improves soil health and nutrient retention. By utilizing CO2, farmers can strengthen the agriculture sector, enhance food security and position the United States as a global leader in agricultural innovation.

Building with Carbon

In the manufacturing sector, CO2 can be used to produce stronger, more durable materials like concrete and other industrial products, without sacrificing quality or affordability. Captured CO2 can be injected into fresh concrete, mineralized to form stable materials and permanently store the CO2, or used as a feedstock for other industrial materials. Because many of these technologies can be integrated into existing cement production facilities, they offer a pathway to rapid, scalable deployment across the construction sector.

Expanding CO2 utilization in cement and concrete can help strengthen domestic supply chains to meet growing global demand. Similarly, using CO2 as a feedstock for plastics, which exist all throughout our supply chains, can help domestic plastic production remain stable, particularly when petrochemical feedstocks are less secure. Utilizing CO2 as a feedstock creates more resilient supply chains for products we rely on, while also enhancing U.S. manufacturing competitiveness by improving product performance and enabling American-made materials to compete globally against higher-emission producers like China.

Carbon Fueling America

Captured CO2 can be used as a key ingredient to produce synthetic fuels and chemicals, creating new pathways to supply reliable, domestically produced energy. Innovators can convert CO₂ into liquid fuels by combining it with hydrogen or using electricity. These processes can produce sustainable aviation fuel, methanol, synthetic diesel and other fuels compatible with today’s engines and infrastructure.

Beyond commercial markets, CO2-derived fuels present a strategic opportunity for national defense. Synthetic fuels can be produced on demand in remote or high-risk environments, minimizing the risks associated with transporting fuel into contested areas and enabling greater operational flexibility for the U.S. military. The Department of War (DOW), through the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), has supported research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) of these technologies. For example, companies have partnered with the DOW to explore and demonstrate the application of these fuel technologies across military operations.

By leveraging CO2 as a feedstock for fuel production, the U.S. can diversify its energy supply, keep production at home and strengthen our national security.

Benefits of Carbon Utilization

Carbon utilization transforms captured emissions into valuable products, unlocking new market opportunities while strengthening American energy, manufacturing and technology leadership:

Policy Recommendations

Preserve and Maintain Improvements to 45Q: The Section 45Q tax credit provides financial incentives per ton of CO2 securely utilized or stored. Recent improvements under the Working Families Tax Cuts created parity across utilization, EOR and storage — supporting technologies that turn CO2 into a valuable commodity. Preserving the improved 45Q tax credit will strengthen U.S. manufacturing competitiveness, enhance energy security and reinforce American energy leadership.

Increase the Reliable Supply of CO2: Access to consistent, high-quality CO₂ is needed to unlock the full potential of carbon utilization technologies. Investing in RD&D of carbon capture and carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies will help ensure a scalable, reliable supply of usable CO₂ from a diverse range of sources, including point-source capture, direct air capture and biogenic processes. Legislation supporting innovation, commercialization and deployment of these technologies, such as the Carbon Removal and Emissions Storage Technologies (CREST) Act of 2023, will accelerate cost reductions, improve efficiency, bring the most competitive technologies to market and enable broader market adoption. 

Expand Carbon Utilization RD&D: Targeted federal RD&D is critical to advancing early-stage carbon utilization technologies and unlocking private investment. The Energy Act of 2020 authorized DOE”s Carbon Utilization Program, now housed within the Office of Hydrocarbons and Geothermal Energy (HGEO), to evaluate novel uses for CO₂ and demonstrate carbon utilization technologies across a range of industrial sectors. Programs like ARPA-E’s MINER initiative support research on using CO2 to unlock critical minerals, while initiatives such as the Carbon Dioxide Removal Purchase Prize help catalyze technologies that can provide and sustain a reliable, scalable supply of CO2. DOE could also coordinate with agencies such as the USGS and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to advance cross-cutting carbon utilization opportunities across mineral, land and agricultural systems. Expanding these federal efforts will accelerate technology deployment and commercialization, broaden market opportunities and strengthen U.S. competitiveness.

Build CO₂ Pipeline Infrastructure: Expanding the nation’s CO2 pipeline network is essential to scaling carbon utilization technologies and connecting supply with demand. Projects require access to reliable, affordable CO2, which depends on a robust and well-connected pipeline system. Legislation supporting CO2 pipeline safety, R&D and streamlined interstate permitting will modernize regulations, reduce permitting bottlenecks and unlock private investment for CCUS infrastructure. This includes legislation like the PIPES Act of 2025 and the PIPELINE Safety Act of 2025, which would reauthorize the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), as well as the Next Generation Pipelines Research and Development Act, which supports the development of advanced pipeline technologies and materials. Strengthening this infrastructure will enable more projects to move forward and reinforce U.S. energy and industrial leadership.

10 NRC Rulemakings to Watch

A sweeping modernization effort is now underway at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The agency is advancing dozens of rulemakings touching nearly every aspect of the licensing process: hearings, environmental reviews, fusion, fee recovery, radiation protection, microreactors and more. This moment is not just a burst of regulatory activity. It is the convergence of sustained efforts across multiple timelines driven by years of bipartisan policy, recent executive action and more than a decade of internal NRC Commission and staff modernization activities.

That convergence matters for three reasons. First, it helps explain why the rulemaking docket feels so crowded. Second, much of the current rulemaking reflects the need to be more efficient, effective and predictable. Third, most of these rules have broad, longstanding consensus and have been in process across multiple Congresses and Administrations.

Seen that way, the current moment is about more than regulatory housekeeping. It is a test of whether the United States can translate nearly 10 years of bipartisan legislative and policy momentum into a licensing system capable of enabling predictable deployment timelines and project costs. Many of the rules initiated by one piece of legislation were also affected by subsequent legislation or executive direction. Here are the 10 rules to watch most closely:

Initiated by Federal Legislation

These rulemakings largely establish regulations for new commercial technologies such as advanced reactors, fusion machines and microreactors. A predictable, durable pathway for these technologies is necessary to enable broad deployment.

Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act of 2019 (NEIMA)

1. Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory Framework for Advanced Reactors (NRC Rule Page)
2. Regulatory Framework for Fusion Machines (NRC Rule Page)

Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 (FRA)

3. Implementation of FRA of 2023 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Amendments (NRC Rule Page)

Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy Act of 2024 (ADVANCE)

4. Licensing Requirements for Microreactors and Other Reactors with Comparable Risk Profiles (NRC Rule Page)
5. Streamlining Contested Adjudications in Licensing Proceedings (NRC Rule Page)

Initiated by Executive Order 14300

These rulemakings, initiated by EO 14300 signed in May 2025, reflect the administration’s interest in the widespread deployment of new nuclear reactors.

6. Modernizing Reactor Licensing, Safety Oversight, and Siting Practices (NRC Rule Page)
7. NRC Reviews of Reactor Designs Previously Authorized by U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) or Department of War (DOW) (NRC Rule Page)
8. Reforming and Modernizing the NRC’s Radiation Protection Framework (NRC Rule Page)
9. A Focused Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) (NRC Rule Page)

Initiated Internally by the NRC

The NRC is not just reacting to outside mandates. It is also trying to reshape the broader regulatory framework on its own terms.

10. Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) for Licensing of New Nuclear Reactors (NRC Rule Page)

 

An Innovation Strategy to Win the Global Energy Race (The Washington Times)

This op-ed was originally published by The Washington Times on April 21, 2026. Click here to read the entire piece.

America’s energy landscape is undergoing a major transformation. Demand is rising from data centers, advanced manufacturing and new domestic industrial activity. At the same time, global competition and geopolitical pressures are intensifying. Countries like China are investing across the full energy and technology landscape, from early-stage research through large-scale deployment, and doing so with a coordinated national strategy. In fact, recent analyses show that China has surpassed the U.S. in total R&D spend.

To compete, the United States will need a more integrated approach to innovation policy. The 119th Congress has an opportunity to strengthen energy and technology leadership by structuring federal policy to treat basic research and applied energy programs as parts of the same innovation system.

De-risking scientific discovery helps keep American inventors ahead, while de-risking commercialization ensures U.S. companies can lead in global markets. Without a strategy that connects these stages, the U.S. risks losing its innovation advantage.

Congress can begin addressing this gap by providing updated guidance and support for key federal research agencies, such as the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Fundamental research programs, particularly within DOE’s Office of Science the largest federal sponsor of basic research in the physical sciences are essential to maintaining leadership in areas like quantum, artificial intelligence and advanced computing. These investments enable long-term work that is unlikely to be funded by the private sector and provide access to national laboratory infrastructure that no single company could replicate.

Click here to read the full article

Drilling for Dominance: Leveraging American Innovation for Enhanced Geothermal (The Ripon Society)

This op-ed was originally published by The Ripon Society on April 20, 2026. Click here to read the entire piece.

A year into the second Trump administration, energy dominance – global leadership and security through abundant, innovative American energy – has gone from a mantra to a guiding principle. Few technologies are better positioned than geothermal power to deliver on this promise in an era of rising energy demand driven by AI and resurgent American manufacturing.

Clean, reliable, baseload geothermal power has quickly become a favored energy technology on both sides of the aisle. Once limited to rare, naturally occurring reservoirs of hot water or steam, next-generation technologies are dramatically expanding where this resource can be developed by innovative companies. Geothermal has made allies across the spectrum, gaining bipartisan political support in Congress and investment interest from venture capital, big tech and oil majors.

The technology’s rapid maturation reflects cutting-edge American innovation, leveraging technology pioneered during the shale revolution and applying it to previously inaccessible geothermal resources. By adapting techniques like horizontal drilling and hydraulic stimulation, enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) engineer a reservoir from scratch. Companies like Fervo Energy have demonstrated how quickly the technology is advancing, having reduced drilling costs by 70 percent since its first wells in 2023.

But in an era of intense partisanship in Washington, the political progress may be even more notable as geothermal’s attributes meet energy priorities across the aisle. Conservatives see a resource that leverages American drilling expertise and provides reliable power. Meanwhile, progressives and climate hawks value its zero-carbon benefits. This convergence of interests has yielded concrete policy outcomes. In 2022, geothermal was included in the clean electricity tax credits enacted in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) signed by President Biden; in 2025, Republicans preserved geothermal’s eligibility for those same credits in President Trump’s signature Working Families Tax Cuts. The tax policy certainty demonstrated by major bills from both political parties reflects enduring bipartisan support for geothermal. That momentum continues today, as multiple bipartisan geothermal permitting bills have passed through House committees, with additional legislative action expected later this year.

Click here to read the full article