• About Us
    • Our Team
    • Our Advisors
    • Careers
    • Leadership Program
  • Our Take
  • Innovation
    • Clean Energy Policy
      • Nuclear
      • Storage
      • Natural Gas
      • Carbon Capture
      • Hydropower
      • Geothermal
    • Clean Industry Policy
      • Cement & Concrete
      • Metals
      • Hydrogen
    • Carbon Removal Policy
      • Carbon Dioxide Removal
      • Agriculture Innovation
    • Tech 101
  • Reports
  • News
    • ClearPath In The News
    • Events & More
    • Press Releases
    • Rundown Archives
  • Search
  • Share
Share

Nuclear

Read ClearPath Nuclear 101’s

Our Tech 101 series is designed to assist even the busiest layperson in gaining an elementary grasp of the byzantine world of conservative clean energy.
Read More

Navigation

Technology OverviewPolicy RecommendationsRecent InitiativesTechnologies to Watch

Nuclear Policy | State of Play

Technology Overview

Nuclear energy generates 19% of the United States’ electricity and supports 120,000 jobs while producing no emissions. The U.S. is the world leader in nuclear power production and is home to 93 of the world's 412 operating reactors. The newest commercial reactor was commissioned at the Vogtle Generating Plant in Georgia.

The market for new nuclear energy is growing globally. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that nuclear power capacity must double globally to 812 GW by 2050 to reach net zero goals. Additionally, at COP28, more than 20 countries, including the U.S., joined a declaration to triple global nuclear energy by 2050. Globally, people support nuclear energy 5:1, and in the U.S. nuclear energy enjoys broad bipartisan support of 76%.

Nuclear power can provide affordable, reliable, and secure energy without producing emissions or pollutants that affect the air and water. Innovative American companies are on the cusp of deploying new nuclear reactors with passive safety features, built-in grid flexibility, and modular construction. American advanced reactors have the potential to change the global energy landscape drastically.

Policy Recommendations

Fund and Execute on Authorized Programs- The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP) supports the development and demonstration of advanced reactor technologies through public-private cost-sharing, microreactor user facilities, and regulatory readiness. X-Energy and TerraPower, the two recipients of the full demo awards, are constructing fuel fabrication facilities and progressing toward commercial reactor licenses from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). These projects received substantial direct funding from the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). However, they, and other more early-stage demonstrations, will require consistent annual appropriations to be successful. Other DOE activities that ensure fuel and supply chain readiness, like the Advanced Nuclear Fuel Availability Program, must succeed in parallel to fuel the ARDP demonstrations.

Establish a Secure, Domestic Fuel Supply Chain- Creating a secure, domestic supply of high-assay, low-enriched uranium (HALEU) fuel is essential to a successful advanced reactor industry. Many advanced reactors operate on a different type of fuel than is used by today’s traditional light-water reactors. Unfortunately, commercial enrichment infrastructure for HALEU is severely limited in the U.S. The Energy Act of 2020 established the Advanced Reactor Fuel Availability Program, but the program requires an infusion of funding to kickstart private capital investment. This could improve fuel security and support the widespread deployment of advanced reactors.

Modernize the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)- The NRC licenses and oversees the civilian use of nuclear energy while protecting the health and safety of the public and the environment. Advanced reactor technology must rapidly scale to maintain American energy security, meet emissions targets, and support American industry. However, existing NRC policies and processes will have difficulty to efficiently licensing the next-generation reactors at the required pace. These new reactors have different fuel and safety characteristics that necessitate a performance-based, risk-informed and technology-neutral licensing process. An agile NRC is necessary to rapidly deploy advanced nuclear technologies.

Improve Export Finance Institutions to Compete with State-Backed Alternatives- Globally, since 2000, Russia and China have built a combined 64 reactors; in that same time, U.S. companies have built six. Today, Russia and China are exporting reactors to at least nine other countries such as Turkey, Egypt, and Argentina. Generous, state-backed financing and robust diplomatic support are key to Russian and Chinese dominance of the international nuclear market. U.S. corporations are not competing in a fair international market.

In 2020, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) took an important step towards re-establishing American nuclear leadership by lifting its ban on financing nuclear projects abroad. Maximizing the capabilities of the U.S. Export-Import Bank (EXIM) and the DFC is critical to the broader U.S. goals of countering authoritarian governments’ political influence and deploying low-emissions technology internationally.

Streamline the Civilian Nuclear Energy Export Control Processes- The diminishing presence of U.S. leadership in the global nuclear industry energy risks ceding global influence to competitors at a time when demand for nuclear energy is growing. Bureaucracy hamstrings U.S. nuclear exports. The U.S. government divides responsibility for export licensing, nuclear security negotiations, capacity-building assistance, financing, and commercial diplomacy between at least 8 U.S. authorities. These activities are vital to maintaining American security and economic interests but should not be an impediment to development and diplomacy. The government can support American industry by helping to level the playing field for innovative U.S. companies. Exporting not just one reactor, but dozens, will require the White House to create and execute a government-wide export strategy, careful reforms to financing rules at EXIM and DFC, and institutionalizing State Department programs like Foundational Infrastructure for Responsible Use of Small Modular Reactor Technology (FIRST).

Recent Initiatives

  • DOE, Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP): The Energy Act of 2020 authorized the ARDP within the DOE to support developing and demonstrating advanced nuclear projects.
    • ARDP Demo Awards provide a federal cost-share to develop, license, build, fuel, and demonstrate commercial advanced reactors. In 2020, the DOE’s Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) awarded TerraPower around $2 billion for its Natrium reactor and X-energy around $1.2 billion for its Xe-100 reactor and a TRISO fuel fabrication facility.
    • Risk Reduction for Future Demonstration Program supports medium-term deployment by helping companies resolve technical, operational, and regulatory challenges and prepare for future demonstration opportunities.

  • DOE, Advanced Nuclear Fuel Availability Program: The Energy Act of 2020 authorized the DOE to pursue multiple pathways to support a domestic supply chain of HALEU for advanced reactor projects. Of note, in November 2023, Centrus Energy produced the nation’s first HALEU in a pilot project supported by this program.

  • Department of Defense (DOD), Defense Logistics Agency Energy (DLA): The DLA is piloting a domestic microreacter program and will award a contract to provide reliable, clean power to the Eielson Airforce Base in Alaska. The contract will require power delivery by 2027 and provides a 30-year, fixed-price contract. In late 2022, DLA released a request for proposals.

  • The DOD’s Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO), Project Pele: This program, operated under the DOD, supports the development and demonstration of mobile microreactors. In 2022, SCO selected BWXT to deliver a prototype in 2024. In 2023, SCO exercised an option to continue developing a design for a second reactor produced by X-Energy. This support will lead to a preliminary engineering design and the initiation of a regulatory pre-application process.

Map of nuclear projects underway in the U.S.

Technologies to Watch

American innovators are developing a variety of new technologies both domestically and internationally.

Large Light-Water Reactors (LWRs)

Nuclear reactors cooled and moderated by water are the most common type of civilian reactor in operation today and have been operating for decades.

  • Westinghouse – AP1000 (1100MWe) – The AP1000 is an evolution of the Westinghouse technology, which is well-established and represents dozens of reactors in the U.S. today. The primary difference is using passive safety systems which reduce the amount of equipment on site and the costs associated with that equipment.

    The AP1000 has been deployed globally. In addition to the two units built in Georgia, four AP1000 reactors operate in China. KEPCO, a South Korean Company, and Framatome, a French company offer similar large LWRs.

Small Modular (SMR) Light-Water Reactors

Similar to large LWRs, there are several designs that are generally smaller versions and use passive safety features. Like other smaller designs, the intent is to design and modularly construct these reactors — like Lego bricks — proposing cost savings through factory-fabricated and transportable components. The smaller power output from SMRs also makes them useful in remote locations or growing communities.

  • General Electric-Hitachi – BWRX-300 (300 MWe) – GE Hitachi has decades of experience designing, licensing, and building reactors, including many in the U.S. The BWRX-300 reactor is its latest design. GE-Hitachi is in early conversations with multiple U.S. entities; additionally, it is planning to build 24 units in Poland and is progressing toward deployment of four reactors in Ontario, Canada.

  • Holtec International – SMR-300 (300 MWe) – Holtec has a long history of decommissioning nuclear plants around the world. Holtec’s first SMR-300 is planned for Michigan where Holtec is repowering a recently closed nuclear power plant. A DOE Risk Reduction award supported design, engineering, and licensing activities.

Liquid-Sodium Fast Reactors

Sodium Fast Reactors are a relatively well-understood technology with hundreds of years of operating experience. In fast reactors, fission is sustained by higher energy particles, which allows for a higher fuel utilization, resulting in more time between refueling and reduced long-lived waste. Additionally, fast reactors are able to access energy in used nuclear fuel that is not attainable in LWR technologies. This capability could reduce the radioactive lifetime of nuclear waste.

  • TerraPower – Natrium (345 MWe) – The Natrium reactor uses a molten salt thermal energy storage system attached to the nuclear reactor, which can boost the electric output to 500 MWe for 5.5 hours. Natrium is a beneficiary of the ARDP cost-share program, and construction of the demonstration project is expected to be completed this decade.

High-Temperature Gas Reactors (HTGR)

HTGRs already operate commercially in the U.K. and are also being developed in China. HTGRs bring both safety and practical benefits. The moderator and coolant (helium or carbon dioxide) are non-reactive and can operate safely at high temperatures. HTGRs often use TRI-structural ISOtropic (TRISO) fuel in which multiple layers of protection surround BB-sized fuel making core melt physically impossible.

HTGRs are also well suited for industrial applications because they can produce industrial-scale process heat, which is both difficult to electrify and the source of 50% of onsite industrial energy use. Industrial heat accounts for about 9 percent of total U.S. emissions, and successful nuclear industrial decarbonization projects can open up an entirely new market for new nuclear technologies.

  • X-energy – Xe-100 (80 MWe/200MWth per reactor, Four reactors per facility) – A pebble-bed (TRISO fuel), gas-cooled reactor designed to produce high-temperature steam or electricity. The Xe-100 is a beneficiary of the ARDP cost share program with plans to commission a demonstration project this decade. X-energy has also signed an agreement with DOW Chemical to construct an X-energy plant to provide heat and steam to a chemical processing plant in Seadrift, TX.

Molten Salt Reactors (MSR)

MSRs were originally studied in the 1970s but have received renewed interest. MSRs encompass a wide variety of reactors that feature cooling by molten salts that can operate at higher temperatures and lower pressures than other reactor types.

Similar to liquid sodium reactors, MSRs can use several fuel cycles, including consuming less desirable waste products.

  • Kairos Power Fluoride Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor (KP-FHR) (140MWe) – The full, commercial-scale KP-FHR utilizes TRISO fuel and a fluoride-salt coolant. Kairos plans to construct a reduced-size demonstration reactor, Hermes 2, at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This work is supported by an award from the DOE ARDP Risk Reduction program.

  • Terrapower – Molten Chloride Fast Reactor (MCFR) This reactor utilizes fuel dissolved directly into the coolant. This allows for continuous operation with integrated refueling. A joint venture between TerraPower and Southern Company is underway to build an experimental reactor (MCRE) at the Idaho National Laboratory. This project also received funding from the DOE ARDP Risk Reduction program to support the design, construction, and operation of the experimental reactor, the world’s first self-sustaining fast-spectrum salt reactor.

  • Terrestrial Energy – Integral Molten Salt Reactor (IMSR) (190MWe/400MWth per reactor, two reactors per facility) – This reactor uses a liquid fuel-coolant combo. The IMSR can produce high-temperature heat for direct use in industrial applications.

Microreactors

Similar to SMRs, microreactors are classified due to their size; however, unlike SMRs, there are a number of coolants used in microreactors. Their small size allows novel manufacturing and deployment strategies. Microreactors are generally 15 MWe or less in size, enough to reliably power a small town, college campus, medical complex, or military base.

  • BWXT Advanced Nuclear Reactor (BANR) (1-5MWe) – BWXT is a nuclear engineering corporation and fuel supplier that supplies power reactors for Navy nuclear submarines. The BANR microreactor is designed to be transportable and use TRISO fuel. This project has received support under the ARDP DOE Risk Reduction program and through a contract with the DOD SCO.

  • Oklo – Aurora (15MWe) – A microreactor capable of operating for 10 years or longer before refueling. Oklo will initially target off-grid applications such as military bases and remote communities. Oklo expects to deploy an Aurora reactor at Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska.

  • USNC – Micro Modular Reactor (MMR) (15MWe/30MWth) – A TRISO-fueled, graphite-moderated, gas-cooled reactor with energy storage, USNC’s is targeting off-grid applications. The first test reactor is planned at the Univeristy of Illinois.

  • Westinghouse – eVinci (5MWe/13MWth) – The eVinci is a microreactor with heatpipe design capable of operating for 8 years or longer without refueling. This project has received support under the ARDP DOE Risk Reduction program.

  • Radiant – Kaleidos (1.2MWe/3.5MWth) – A transportable microreactor designed for off-grid applications to replace diesel generators, this design uses high-temperature helium gas and TRISO fuel.

CLEARPATH

For Information
518 C St NE Suite 300
Washington, DC 20002
info@clearpath.org
For Press
media@clearpath.org
About usOur TakeInnovationReports
News
Search
Share
Sitemap
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
Terms of Use
Data Access Request
Weekly Newsletter Signup
plusfacebookbarslinkedininstagramshare-alttimes-rectanglex-twitter